3D INSPECT ELEMENT CHROME HOW TO
3D INSPECT ELEMENT CHROME MP4
3D INSPECT ELEMENT CHROME CODE

Gemini tries to get the document part right I think. Things like Gemini are interesting as they show a route to tech that separates again documents and applications working with documents. It will 'work'вЂ¦ Because there is just no semantic meaning to those names! As a trivial example, everybody is free to put a h1 below a h6.

3D INSPECT ELEMENT CHROME HOW TO

There is no semantics (no meaning) behind the names.Д®ven there are proposals how to use elements 'semantically correct' nothing enforces it. It makes no difference that you now call some boxes with some new names as those boxes get custom styling and behavior anyway. The semantic web is dead since invention. There is no 'semantic aspect' of the web. PS: Also as other have pointed out in the thread 3D on the web is over two decades old yet has never been standardized. element is much better suited to that, and if that element had not been standardized, we would arguably have to choose between 'Youtube browser' and Flash player fallback, which is arguably worse for everyone involved.

3D INSPECT ELEMENT CHROME MP4

Just like technically you can parse an MP4 video frame by frame using JS to display each frame in a canvas, doesn't mean you should. That being said, if there is an established 3D model standard, i think it's better overall if the browser implements it properly, rather than having two dozen half-baked JS implementations eating all your CPU/RAM just to display a tiny square. I agree that 3D/VR is definitely not a basic need for the web and i personally don't want/intend to use it. It was an answer to people elsewhere in the thread complaining that this new element would not support lighting and other sophisticated 3D rendering features. Sorry 'basic needs' refered to 'basic needs' in terms of 3D rendering. It's going to get very minimal benefits from browsers and devices getting better over time, it won't get native UI changes - in 5 years it'll look very dated, if it's still accessible.ДЄ model element makes a lot of sense to me.

3D INSPECT ELEMENT CHROME CODE

The other challenge of doing everything yourself is that code is stuck in time.

I wonder how long transit spent getting a truck rendering on this page. But wow you gotta get a lot of JS slapped together to just get something rendering. Sure we've got canvas, and WebGL, and WebGPU, and libraries like three.js, which work. A shoe company wanting to have a model of their sneakers in their shop.

Say you're writing a course explaining how differential gears work - a 3d model of that could be really handy to look at to learn. There's lots of good reasons to semantically want to embed a 3d model in a page, like any other type of media. This proposal might not be perfect, but I think the idea is great. Based on the comments so far, I think I'm in the minority who think this would be a good feature for the web.

3d inspect element chrome